Works on its own
Titan AI™ is a complete engine by itself. You can buy and run it without Theta AI™, and it does not need Theta AI™ results to start. Your hiring team makes the decision.
Product definition
Titan AI™ is AI Psychometrics Inc.'s conversational situational judgment assessment for smaller candidate groups. From your job description it writes scenarios that belong to the role, and candidates answer in their own words. Adaptive follow-up examines the reasoning behind each answer, and the assessment stops between 4 and 12 scenarios once its precision target is met. Hiring teams review the response evidence before deciding. Titan AI™ runs independently of Theta AI™.
- Response
- Written answers in the candidate's own words
- Delivery
- Adaptive stop between 4 and 12 scenarios at the precision target
- Follow-up
- Examines the reasoning behind each answer
Compare the engines
Both engines start from the same job description and write scenarios for the role. They answer different questions: Titan AI™ examines why individual candidates judge the way they do; Theta AI™ reads how a large cohort judges.
Intended use
Theta AI™
Large-cohort screening
Titan AI™
Smaller-group, in-depth assessment
Shared starting point
Theta AI™
A job description and role-specific scenarios
Titan AI™
A job description and role-specific scenarios
Candidate response
Theta AI™
Choose the most and least effective of five actions
Titan AI™
Explain an approach in writing and answer adaptive follow-up questions
Evidence for review
Theta AI™
Structured response evidence and cohort context
Titan AI™
Written responses and follow-up reasoning
Can run independently
Theta AI™
Yes
Titan AI™
Yes
Hiring decision
Theta AI™
Made by the employer after human review
Titan AI™
Made by the employer after human review
Choose Titan AI™ when a shortlist deserves a deeper look at the reasoning behind the answers.
Methods and report examples
- Titan AI™ synthetic report exampleThe report design a hiring team reviews after a Titan AI™ assessment: competency evidence, follow-up reasoning, and cohort context.
- Theta AI™ synthetic report exampleThe companion report design for the Theta AI™ large-cohort Best and Worst screening.
- Current methods and interpretation limitsWhat the current methods support, and where interpretation should stop.
Synthetic report examples illustrate the report design. They do not establish hiring accuracy or prove resistance to AI-assisted responses.
How it works
From your job description to evidence your team can review.
01
Role brief
You share the job description. We turn it into the competencies, work conditions, and risks the conversation should test.
02
Conversational SJT
Candidates work through realistic job scenarios for that role and explain their approach in free text.
03
Adaptive follow-up
Adaptive follow-up questions test why the candidate took that approach, while fixed scoring standards keep the review tied to the role's competencies.
04
Individual depth report
Each completed candidate receives a Competency Mastery Report with per-competency evidence and a recruiter-readable interpretation, viewable from the portal with access recorded in the audit log.
How Titan AI™ tests judgment
Not just the answer. The reasoning behind it.
Every Titan AI™ scenario is written from your job description. The candidate explains their approach in their own words, and follow-up questions press on the reasoning.
Written for your role
Scenarios are generated from your job description, not pulled from a generic item bank.
Words first
The candidate answers in free text, and targeted follow-up tests the reasoning, so a polished first sentence is not the whole story.
Every score has a trail
The role brief, the candidate's answers, the follow-up, and reviewer history stay linked in the portal.
Inside the Titan AI™ report
Scenarios written for the role. Every score carries its evidence.
Five scenes from the delivered report designs — an 84-page individual report and a 68-page cohort report. Every figure comes from the synthetic sample report — it illustrates the layout, not a real candidate.
Adaptive path · θ waterfall — individual report
Figure 01Adaptive path · θ waterfall
Watch the uncertainty narrow, scenario by scenario.
In this synthetic sample, the run administered 9 of 14 bank scenarios: the standard error fell from 0.650 to 0.295 — down 39% by scenario 5 — and the run stopped once the 0.30 precision target was met.
Sample · SE 0.650 → 0.295Quote evidence board · competency deep dive — individual report
Figure 02Quote evidence board
Open a score — every administered response has the candidate's own words behind it.
In the synthetic sample, every administered scenario response carries excerpts behind the sample scores — 68.63 at the strongest competency, 42.69 at the weakest. The low-scoring quotes share a pattern: not choosing what to defer, and telling the customer only after the probe.
Sample · 68.63 strongest · 42.69 weakestMeasurement precision in depth — individual report
Figure 03Measurement precision
The error budget, scenario by scenario.
In the synthetic sample, error falls 39% within five scenarios and meets the 0.30 target after nine. The report shows the full precision path, not just the final number.
Sample · target after 9 scenariosAll candidates · similarity — cohort report
Figure 04Cohort Insight report
Every completer, a person-level path. No ranking.
In the synthetic cohort, 42 candidates started and 40 completed. The report draws 40 person-level score paths — shapes, not clusters — and order and labels carry no ranking. Competency medians sit close at 48.66–50.73, risk awareness is the shared weak spot, and onboarding maps the first 12 weeks.
Sample · 40 completers · medians 48.66–50.73Interview kit · follow-up trail — cohort report
Figure 05Follow-up → interview kit
Every answer hands the interview its first questions.
The synthetic cohort ran 682 adaptive follow-up probes across 40 completers — 17.1 per person, 1.64 per answer. The interview kit carries that trail forward: what held up under the probe, what changed after it, and the two points worth pressing in person.
Sample · 682 probes · 1.64 per answerChain of custody
Every figure in these five scenes comes from the synthetic sample report — it shows the layout and mechanics of the delivered reports, not a real candidate and not a hiring threshold.
What you receive
- A Competency Mastery Report with scores for each competency defined in the role brief.
- Per-competency evidence that pairs the initial answer with the adaptive follow-up and the candidate's reasoning.
- A clear view of what held up under challenge, what changed, and what still needs human review.
- Per-competency evidence and reports viewable from the portal, with access recorded in the audit log.
Pricing
Checking pricing
per completed assessment
Check the pricing page when portal prices are available.
Prices shown are current base prices and may be adjusted with changes in demand and cost. The final amount, including fees and applicable taxes, is confirmed on the checkout page.
Optional
Want both? Connect them.
If you also choose Theta AI™, Theta AI™ evidence can focus Titan AI™'s follow-up questions. This is optional; Titan AI™ does not require Theta AI™.