Works on its own
Theta AI™ is a complete engine by itself. You can buy and run it without Titan AI™. Each completed assessment produces its own report, and your hiring team makes the decision.
Product definition
Theta AI™ is AI Psychometrics Inc.'s role-specific situational judgment assessment for large candidate cohorts. From your job description it writes situations that belong to the role, not a generic bank reused across jobs. Candidates choose the most and the least effective of five actions in each situation, and hiring teams review structured response evidence with cohort context before deciding.
- Response
- Most and least effective of five actions
- Scenarios
- Written from your job description for the role
- Review
- Structured response evidence with cohort context
Compare the engines
Both engines start from the same job description and write scenarios for the role. They answer different questions: Theta AI™ reads how a large cohort judges; Titan AI™ examines why individual candidates judge the way they do.
Intended use
Theta AI™
Large-cohort screening
Titan AI™
Smaller-group, in-depth assessment
Shared starting point
Theta AI™
A job description and role-specific scenarios
Titan AI™
A job description and role-specific scenarios
Candidate response
Theta AI™
Choose the most and least effective of five actions
Titan AI™
Explain an approach in writing and answer adaptive follow-up questions
Evidence for review
Theta AI™
Structured response evidence and cohort context
Titan AI™
Written responses and follow-up reasoning
Can run independently
Theta AI™
Yes
Titan AI™
Yes
Hiring decision
Theta AI™
Made by the employer after human review
Titan AI™
Made by the employer after human review
Choose Theta AI™ when many applicants need one consistent, role-specific screen.
Methods and report examples
- Theta AI™ synthetic report exampleThe report design a hiring team reviews after a Theta AI™ assessment: Best and Worst response patterns, item health, and cohort context.
- Titan AI™ synthetic report exampleThe companion report design for the Titan AI™ written-response assessment with adaptive follow-up.
- Current methods and interpretation limitsWhat the current methods support, and where interpretation should stop.
Synthetic report examples illustrate the report design. They do not establish hiring accuracy or prove resistance to AI-assisted responses.
How it works
From your job description to evidence your team can review.
01
Custom JD + SJT input
You share the job description. We map its responsibilities, decision conditions, risks, and competency priorities into a role brief.
02
Role-specific scenarios
New five-option situational judgment scenarios are generated for that role, rather than drawn from an off-the-shelf item bank.
03
Best+Worst responses
In each scenario, the candidate chooses the most and least effective of five actions. These are two choices in one role-specific test, not separate ability assessments.
04
Cohort comparison report
The synthetic sample report illustrates descriptive Best and Worst evidence, uncertainty, and cohort context. It is not real-candidate validation or a hiring threshold.
Inside the Theta AI™ report
Every situation gets a Best and a Worst pick. Every pick becomes evidence.
Four scenes from the delivered report designs — a 41-page individual report and a 45-page cohort report. Every figure comes from the synthetic sample report — it illustrates the layout, not a real candidate.
Choice fingerprint · 20 situations × 5 options — individual report
Figure 01Role brief → assessment
One job description unfolds into new situations.
Each role gets newly generated situations — never an off-the-shelf item bank. In this synthetic sample, 20 situations × 5 options, and every candidate makes a Best and a Worst pick in every situation, all on the same scale.
Sample · 20 situations × 5 optionsInterviewer deep questions · rubric — individual report
Figure 02Risky picks → interview kit
Every harmful pick becomes the interview.
In the synthetic sample, 2 harmful picks and 2 inverted picks move straight into the interview. The kit carries the question, the follow-ups, and the signs of a strong and a weak answer — and the same picks shape the 30/60/90-day development plan.
Sample · 2 harmful picks · 2 inversionsValues fingerprint · decision style — individual report
Figure 03Values fingerprint · decision style
The values behind every pick, made visible.
In the synthetic sample, 2 picks clash with a company priority value — Integrity — and go to the interview, never to an automatic rejection. The value supported most often is 'Customer'. The decision style reads Balanced — stable in 98.6% of 1,000 resamples; 67% of the synthetic cohort keeps the same type.
Sample · stable in 98.6% of resamplesItem health · measurement consistency — cohort report
Figure 04Measurement quality
Every item audited, line by line.
In the synthetic sample, all 20 items separate the top and bottom groups; 12 sit on the key-review list for the next iteration. In the synthetic 24-person cohort, consistency reads split-half 0.88 and α 0.88 — descriptive sample figures, not real-world reliability evidence.
Sample · split-half 0.88 · α 0.88Chain of custody
Every figure in these four scenes comes from the synthetic sample report — it shows the layout and mechanics of the delivered reports, not a real candidate and not a hiring threshold.
What you receive
- A sample report design that keeps Best and Worst choices, descriptive figures, uncertainty, and method limits visible together.
- Cohort context that shows where each candidate sits relative to others who took the same role assessment.
- Model and report provenance recorded in the portal so reviewers can trace how a result was produced.
Pricing
Checking pricing
per completed assessment
Check the pricing page when portal prices are available.
Prices shown are current base prices and may be adjusted with changes in demand and cost. The final amount, including fees and applicable taxes, is confirmed on the checkout page.
Optional
Want both? Connect them.
If you also choose Titan AI™, Theta AI™ evidence can focus Titan AI™'s follow-up on a smaller group. This is optional; Theta AI™ does not require Titan AI™.