01 · Decision brief
The page a hiring leader reads first
A concise view of role fit, evidence strength, unresolved risk, and recommended next review. It separates observed evidence from interpretation so a recommendation never masquerades as a fact.
02 · Theta AI™ judgment
Two kinds of judgment, read separately
In each job scenario the candidate picks the most and the least effective of five options. The report reads spotting effective actions and spotting harmful actions on separate axes, each with an interval and cohort context, and marks scores as descriptive until calibration is complete.
03 · Response Integrity Review
A reason to review, never an accusation
This fictional chapter illustrates how research-stage timing, consistency, and anomaly signals could be documented with their source and limitations. The detector remains in Shadow Mode; these are not released customer findings or misconduct decisions.
04 · Titan AI™ mastery
What happened when reasoning was challenged
Per-competency evidence pairs the initial answer with the adaptive follow-up and the candidate’s reasoning. Reviewers can see whether a strong claim held up under ambiguity.
05 · Interview plan
Questions generated from this candidate’s evidence
The report converts gaps and contradictions into specific interview probes. Each prompt is tied to a competency or risk signal, not generic interview advice.
06 · Audit record
Recover how the report was produced
Campaign, role model, engine, assessment version, timestamps, reviewer status, and report source remain linked so an authorized team can reconstruct the evidence chain.
Theta AI™ sample · Best+Worst judgment report · Individual 29 pages · Cohort 33 pages
Theta AI™ Judgment Reports
A fictional candidate and a synthetic group of 120. Each job scenario has five response options, and the candidate picks the most and the least effective. See what they judged effective, what they judged harmful, and what to check in the interview. No ranking. Synthetic data; the report delivered after a real assessment follows these layouts, with the candidate and cohort data changed.
Titan AI™ sample · Conversational report · Individual 84 pages · Cohort 68 pages
Titan AI™ Competency Mastery and Cohort Insight Reports
A fictional candidate and a synthetic campaign. Candidates answer job scenarios in their own words, with adaptive follow-up questions. See mastery by competency, the conversation evidence behind each score, and what to check in the interview. Synthetic data.
The point
A report should make uncertainty useful
The strongest output is not a louder score. It is a structured record of what is supported, what is unresolved, and what the hiring team should test next.